There's been a lot of talk recently about the Federal ID. I've hear commentaries on it on a lot of radio and TV newscasts. I think it's a good idea in theroy, but the government has got a long way to go on protecting our security...and privacy. Is our future going to be decided by our Big Brother, the government. Yep.This is going to be a hot topic in the coming months. The battle on what techology to use is only beginning. People have found problems with the RFID chips. And what is to prevent someone from cloning yours? And what stops from terrorists or illegal aliens from making there own ID's once they figure out how to do it? So, to make it easier for you to understand, check out this article from the website eWeek...
After a rising tide of concern over the security, privacy and monetary implications of the Department of Homeland Security's Real ID Act, the Department has handed down proposed regulations that drastically alter its original intent. The proposed regulations, handed down March 1 by DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff, suggest using machine-readable bar code technology rather than RFID (radio-frequency identification), as had been anticipated, and called for states to implement (or upgrade) a database to hold documentation information, but stipulated that the government will not require states to integrate with a national database.So there you have it. All around the internet there are article on how to fake, forge or destroy the upcoming technology in these ID cards. Our security is at risk. The battle has just begun...stay tuned!
"I always want to dispel the notion that the Real ID Act or our standards mandates anything like a Big Brother kind of database or style of government," said Chertoff. "We at the Department of Homeland Security in the federal government will not build, will not own, and will not operate any central database containing personal information. The data will continue to be held at the state level as it has traditionally been since they began to issue driver's licenses. And by improving the quality of the documents, we're going to make it very, very much harder for people to forge them, counterfeit them, or alter them."
Chertoff also extended the date states have to comply with the Act from May 11, 2008, to a "phase-in period" through May 2013.
The Act, as it was initially proposed in 2005, would have each state implementing a database to hold digital images of citizen documentation—birth certificate, social security number, W-2 form, passport, and utility bill, for example—and share that information with other states, countries and the federal government through a national database. It also called for the implementation of machine-readable technology—the front runner for which was RFID, a technology that has a lot of security and privacy advocates up in arms given its inherent risks.
What DHS proposed instead is the use of bar code technology on driver's licenses. The regulation would require each state's license to have on its face space available for 39 characters for full legal name, address, digital photograph, gender, date of birth, signature, document number and machine-readable technology. That boils down to the use of 2-D bar codes already used by 45 states and the District of Columbia, according to Chertoff, who said, "DHS leans toward encrypting the data on the bar code as a privacy protection and requests comments on how to proceed given operational considerations."
Here's where the proposed regulations get tricky. While DHS doesn't require states to include the use of RFID or biometrics—face or iris scans, for example—it isn't eschewing those practices either.
"States may independently choose to implement biometrics into their driver's license process," said Chertoff. "[DHS] does not require a State to collect fingerprints, iris images, or other biometric data in connection with obtaining a license and has no plans to serve as a repository for the face images the states will collect."
The fear of many Real ID Act proponents, particularly Rep. Jim Guest, a Missouri Republican who is leading a 38-state rebellion against the Act, is that even watered--down regulations, once enacted, can be changed to include stronger requirements.
"My concern is that even if [DHS] waters [the Act] down a bit they will try and accomplish what they want with some other legislation," said Guest, who advocates a repeal of the Act. "Homeland Security has total control, with no judicial or legislative control over this. Once they issue this, there is no way of stopping them."
Chertoff, in his public comments, said that the implementation of the Real ID Act's actual technology boils down to common sense.
"Now here's how these standards are going to work. It's very simple and it's really a matter of common sense," said Chertoff, during a March 1 press conference. "Applicants are going to need to bring documents to their state Department of Motor Vehicles offices in order to validate or prove five things: who they are, what their date of birth is, what their legal status is in the United States, their social security number, and their address. None of this stuff is top-secret stuff."
Many states, however, have said they cannot afford the potentially millions of dollars it will take to implement the extra technology mandated by the Act. DHS said yesterday that up to 20 percent of the state's Homeland Security Grant Program funds can be used to help states implement Real ID. The funds will be made available during the 2007 grant cycle.
The public and other interested parties have 60 days from March 1 to submit comments about the proposed regulations. After the two-month period closes, DHS will review the comments and submit the final rules for compliance.
